Screening-level Transportation BCA

Corridor decisions that used to take weeks now take minutes.

Centerline Studio combines a live cross-section design workspace with a full lifecycle benefit-cost analysis engine — purpose-built for the earliest, highest-leverage stage of corridor planning.

Scroll
6+
Extended analysis
modules
40
Year lifecycle
horizon
5
Monetised benefit
categories
<60s
From blank canvas
to full BCA
The problem with early-stage analysis

Most analysis happens after the decision is already made.

The first 10% of a project shapes 90% of outcomes. Yet formal BCA has historically been too slow and costly to run at the exploration stage — so planners commit to geometry before they've tested it.

Before — Traditional workflow

BCA commissioned after design lock-in

By the time a formal analysis is funded, the corridor geometry is already fixed and alternatives can't be meaningfully tested.

Days or weeks per scenario

Traditional BCA tools require specialist data assembly, spreadsheet wrangling, and re-runs for every change in assumptions.

Results locked in jargon

NPV, BCR, and discount rates mean nothing to community stakeholders or decision-makers without translation — which takes more time.

After — Centerline Studio

Analysis drives the design conversation

Adjust lane widths, bike facility type, or parking and watch the BCR and NPV recalculate instantly — so geometry and economics evolve together.

From blank canvas to full BCA in under a minute

Five scenario templates or a custom build. Cost inputs are pre-loaded. The lifecycle model runs in the background — no manual setup.

Plain-language narrative output

Every result comes with a decision narrative ready for project memos, briefing notes, and stakeholder presentations.

Core workspace

Every element of corridor design, connected to the economics.

Live cross-section design

Drag-and-drop geometry control for every corridor element — sidewalks, furnishing zones, travel lanes, bike facilities, parking, and transit infrastructure. Right-of-way constraints enforced in real time.

Interactive

Lifecycle BCA engine

Full net present value, benefit-cost ratio, and discounted payback year across a 5–40 year horizon. Configurable discount rate and capital cost escalation. Outputs update with every design change.

Real-time

Five benefit categories

Monetised safety benefits, cycling mode-shift, active travel health value, travel time savings, and environmental emissions reduction — all calculated from your cross-section geometry.

Comprehensive

Decision narrative

Plain-language interpretation of every output — formatted for direct use in project memos, council briefings, and feasibility reports. No translation layer required.

Export-ready

Scenario templates

Five one-click presets — protected retrofit, main street, transit priority, streetcar corridor, and compact retrofit — pre-loaded with typical geometry and cost assumptions to jumpstart any analysis.

5 templates

Guided tour

A built-in spotlight walkthrough introduces every workspace zone, input, and output — so new users are productive within minutes without reading documentation.

Built-in
🛡

Safety

Crashes avoided — PDO, injury, and fatal — valued against HCM unit costs

🚲

Cycling

Journey quality and induced demand via NACTO/PBIC elasticity multipliers

❤️

Health

Value per induced active-travel trip using WHO/HEAT methodology

Travel time

Annual person-hours saved across all corridor users and modes

🌿

Environment

Reduced VMT and tailpipe emissions valued at current social cost of carbon

Extended analysis

Six specialist modules for deeper decisions.

Beyond the core BCA, six extended modules answer the questions that come up in every corridor study — sensitivity, equity, emissions, demand, federal funding eligibility, and alternatives comparison.

01

Alternatives Comparison

Snapshot any two scenario states and compare geometry, costs, and all BCA outputs side-by-side. Works across templates or custom configurations.

02

Tornado Sensitivity

A ranked bar chart showing how a ±25% swing in each key driver — capital cost, discount rate, safety benefits, cycling uptake — moves your final BCR. Know exactly where uncertainty lives.

03

Carbon Accounting

Estimates annual CO₂ reduction from mode shift and VMT reduction, set against construction embodied carbon — yielding a lifecycle carbon balance and social value estimate.

04

Induced Demand Model

Applies NACTO/PBIC facility-type elasticity multipliers to project new daily cycling trips generated by the proposed treatment — and values them in the BCA.

05

Equity Analysis

A 0–100 equity score derived from active-transport investment share, non-motorised benefit weighting, and contextual income and car-ownership data for the project area.

06

Federal Grant Match

Scores your project against RAISE, SS4A, CRP, CMAQ, ATIIP, and TAP eligibility criteria — identifying your strongest funding angle before the application is written.

MERIDIAN assistant

Your methodology expert, built in.

MERIDIAN is a knowledge-base assistant trained on the tool's full methodology — BCR, NPV, Rule of Half, discount rates, NACTO guidance, and more. Ask it anything. Get plain-language answers, not jargon.

It explains your results, helps you understand assumptions, and guides you through the analysis logic — so you're always confident in what you're presenting.

MERIDIAN — methodology assistant
You
Why is my BCR dropping when I widen the cycle lane?
M
Widening from a painted to a protected lane increases capital cost — but the cycling benefit only scales with the elasticity multiplier, which has an upper bound. If the ROW comes from a travel lane, you also lose travel-time benefit. The net effect can reduce BCR even as safety improves. Try running Alternatives Comparison to see both scenarios quantified side by side.
You
What discount rate should I use?
M
For public infrastructure BCA in Canada, the Treasury Board recommends a real discount rate of 7–8%. US OMB guidance uses 7% as default. Run your Tornado sensitivity to show how the BCR changes across the plausible range — this is standard practice in screening-level work.
Scenario templates

Five corridor typologies, ready to run.

🚴

Protected retrofit

Physical separation added to an existing arterial. Parking removal scenario with safety uplift.

🏪

Main street

Mixed-use commercial corridor balancing pedestrian amenity, cycling access, and on-street parking.

🚌

Transit priority

Dedicated bus lanes with active transport improvements. High-frequency network context.

🚋

Streetcar corridor

Fixed guideway integration with pedestrian realm design and cycling facility configuration.

🏙

Compact retrofit

Constrained ROW requiring trade-offs between all modes. Sensitivity-focused design scenario.

Methodology & authorship
"Fast analysis isn't less rigorous. It means you can test more options before committing — and that's where the value is."

Adam Jones, AICP Senior transportation planner and BCA practitioner. Centerline Studio was built to put lifecycle economic analysis at the front of corridor planning — not the back.

The methodology draws on NACTO urban street design guidance, PBIC facility elasticity research, Treasury Board and OMB discount-rate frameworks, and WHO/HEAT active-travel health valuation.

Methodology standards

NACTO Urban Street Design Guide Facility typology and cycling demand parameters
PBIC Elasticity Research Induced cycling demand multipliers by facility type
WHO / HEAT Framework Active-travel health benefit valuation
Treasury Board / OMB Guidance Discount rate and lifecycle NPV methodology
Practitioner Review Internal review and validation

Start your first corridor analysis today.

Access is invite-based and available to transportation planning professionals and collaborators. Submit a request and you'll receive your invite code immediately.

How access works Submit your name and email. You'll receive an invite code on the spot — no waiting for admin approval. Enter it to get into the tool. Access can be revoked at any time by the administrator.